Collaborator :
INAGROSA Technology of South Africa.
Title: Effect of
time of spraying of Kadostim on Sugarcane.
Author : R.B.
Khandagave and P.G. Satpute.
As per the
protocol issued by INAGROSA, of South Africa, two field experiments on farmers field were
taken to know the effect of time of spray of kadostim as growth ripeners, whose chemical
name is not furnished by them. The Kadostim spray was taken at two different phase of
crushing seasons ie early and late crushing season @ 1.0 lit/ha on sugarcane variety CoC
671. These experiments were laid out in Latin square design with six treatments. Early and
late crushing experiments were harvested in the last week of December and April
respectively. The spraying times viz. 17 weeks before harvest (WBH), (T1), 13 WBH (T2), 9
WBH (T3), 6 WBH (T4), 3 WBH (T5) and untreated until (T6) were formed as treatments for
these two experiments. The observations recorded on these two experiments are as presented
in Table 20 and 20a.
Data presented in
tables indicated that application of Kadostim @1000 ml/ha enhanced the Brix%, Pol%.
However it failed to produce significant results on these arameters and pol% in
cane impovement was 2.24% when spraying was done 13 weeks before harvest. Mean cane
weight, CCS percent and fibre were unaffected by the time of spray and Kadostim
application. It is worth noting that purity percent was significantly higher due to
spraying of Kadostim at 9 weeks before harvest (6.72%) over untreated control. Therefore
spraying of Kadostim enhanced the purity % in cane and it has no affect on mean cane
weight fibre percent during early part of crush. However while experimenting, it was
observed that Kadostim spray at 17 weeks before harvest showed sideshoot development at
the top portion of the cane.
Kadostim spray at
later part of the crushing season showed that Kadostim @ 1000 ml/ha improved brix, pol,
purity and CCS percentage. The max. pol percentage increased to the tune of 48% was
noticed when Kadostim sprayed 9 weeks before harvest. Similarly purity and CCS% of cane
were also improved to the extent of 2.28 and 1.55 percent respectively. The improvement in
pol % cane was mainly attributed to enhance the purity percentage. Other parameters like
Mean cane weight, Fibre % were not much affected. While experimenting, it was observed
that the heavy side shoots sprouting found especially in 17 weeks before spraying. However
all the parameters were found to be nonsignificant.`
Table 20.
Effect of Kadostim sparying time (@ 1000 ml/ha) on sugarcane quality attributes (1998).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number in parenthesis indicate percentage increase over control. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
WBH = Weeks before harvest. |
Table 20a.
Effect of Kadostim spraying time (@ 1000 ml/ha) on sugarcane (Cv. CoC 671) quality
attributes (1998).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number in parenthesis indicate percentage increase over control. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
WBH = Weeks before harvest. |
|
|
|