 |
Title :
Evaluation of promising varieties for Early, Mid and Late crushing season (6 Experiments)
Author : R.B.
Khandagave and P. G.Satpute.
Experiments were
conducted during 1995-96 season. These experiments were conducted to study the response of
different varieties of sugarcane for different months of harvesting. Sugarcane varieties
included in the trial were CoC 671, CoC 92061, Co 85246, Co 87044, Co 86032, CoM 88121 and
Co 8014 and four dates of harvest at bimonthly intervals i.e 10th, 12th, 14th and 16th
month. The experiments were liadout in two factorial randomised block design. All the
recommended practices viz; seed rate fertilizer application, irrigation etc. were followed
uniformly for all the experimental plots. This project consists of six monthly planting
dates from September to February. The results obtained from each experiment are elucidated
below.
Experiment 1.
(September-96 planting) (Table 1)
(a) Germination percentage: |
There was no significant difference among the treatments and combinations. |
(b) Cane formed shoots (lakh/ha): |
CoM
88121 recorded significantly higher cane formed shoots (1.93) compared to all other
varieties except Co 86032 which recorded on par cane formed shoots (1.83). Months of
harvesting showed non-significant differences. |
|
Co 87044 recorded significantly higher plant height of 225.87 compared to
all other varieties except CoC 671 which was on par. Significantly higher plant height of
236 cm was observed at 16th month compared to other ages of harvest. Similarly 10th, 12th
and 14th month harvest showed significantly higher plant height over one another. |
|
CoC 92061 recorded significantly higher no. of internodes (29.77) over
rest of the varieties except CoC 671 which showed on par results with CoC 92061. 16th
month harvest produced significantly higher no. of internodes over 10th, 12th and 14th
month crop age. |
(e) Number of millable canes (lakh/ha) |
CoM
88121 recorded significantly higher NMC (0.98) compared to all other varieties. However
rest of the varieties showed on par NMC. Non-significant results were obtained due to
different ages of harvests i.e 10th, 12th, 14th and 16th month of crop age. |
|
CoC 671
produced significantly higher cane yield (93.62) over Co 85246, (73.76) CoM 88121 (81.18)
and Co 8014 (72.76). However cane yield of CoC 671 was found on par with CoC 92061
(92.64), Co 86032 (92.70) and Co 87044 (88.51).
Increased age of
harvest from 10th to 16th month significantly increased cane yield recording significantly
higher cane yield of 97.82 at 16th month of crop age. |
|
CoC 671
(11.23), CoC 92061 (11.08) and Co 86032 (10.70) were showed on par results with respect to
CCS Yield. Co 87044 (9.44), Co 85246 (9.31), CoM 88121 (8.78) and Co 8014 (8.38) found on
par with each other.
Significantly
higher CCS Yield (14.07) at 16th month harvest was recorded and further increased age of
harvest from 10th to 14th month produced significantly higher CCS Yield.
Interaction
effect of all the parameters showed non-significant results. |
|
Significantly
higher brix value (18.51) (Table 1a) was observed in CoC 92061 over rest of the varieties
except Co 85246, CoC 671, Co 86032. Similarly Co 85246 recorded significantly higher pol
(16.24) except CoC 92061 and CoC 671 and significantly lower reducing sugars in CoC 671,
CoC 92061, Co 85246, Co 86032 and Co 87044 was observed compared to CoM 88121 (1.38).
Increased age of harvest significantly increased Brix, Pol percent of juice. Similarly
reducing sugars was significantly lower at 14th and 16th month of harvest compared to 10th
month of crop age.
CoC 671, CoC
92061 and Co 86032 known to produce higher cane as well as sugar yield. Advancing in age
of harvest increased cane and sugar yield. |
(a) Germination percentage: |
Different
treatments and their combinations did not affect the germination percentage significantly. |
(b) Cane formed shoots (lakh/ha): |
Significantly higher cane formed shoots were recorded in Co 86032 (1.44)
and it was on par with CoC 92061. Other varieties did not differ significantly with
respect to cane formed shoots.
There was no
significant difference due to age of harvest and the interaction of varieties and age of
harvest. |
|
Co 87044 recorded significantly higher plant height (251.92) but was on
par with CoC 671 (244.00). 16th month of harvest recorded significantly higher plant
height of 261.00 compared to 10th (159.76), 12th (224.76) and 14th (248.19) month of crop
age. |
|
CoC
92061 (30.69) recorded significantly higher no. of internodes compared to all other
varieties. Significantly higher no. of internodes (30.10) were observed at 16th month of
harvest compared to 10th, 12th and 14th month of harvest. |
|
Significantly
higher NMC (1.06) was observed in CoM 88121 except Co 87044. Increased age did not
influence NMC. |
|
Significantly
higher cane yield was recorded in CoC 92061 (95.40) but it was on par with CoC 671
(93.80), Co 86032 (91.0) and Co 87044 (88.91). Significantly higher cane yield of 99.94
was observed at 16th month of harvest, compared 10th (68.60), 12th (84.37) and 14th
(92.87) month of crop age. |
|
CoC
92061 and CoC 671 were found on par with each other recording 13.30 and 12.82 CCS t/ha
respectively but they were significantly superior over all other varieties. 16th month of
harvest recorded significantly higher CCS yield (15.72) over all ages of harvest i.e 10th
(7.32), 12th (9.79) and 14th (13.59). Interaction effect for all other parameters was
non-significant. |
(h) Juice quality parameters: (Table 2a) |
Significantly
higher Brix was recorded in Co 85246 (24.19) compared to all other varieties. Similarly
pol percent (22.32) with lowest reducing sugars (0.85) 14th and 16th month of harvest
recorded on par brix value but it significantly differed with 10th and 12th month of
harvest pol percent was significantly higher at 16th month of harvest (20.96) compared
10th, 12th and 14th month of harvest. Significantly lowest reducing sugars (0.75) at 16th
month of harvest was recorded similarly 14th month was significantly lower (0.91) compared
to 10th (1.30) and 12th (1.10) month of harvest. Interaction effect of all these juice
quality parameters showed non-significant result. |
CoC 92061, CoC
671 showed better performance compared to all other varieties However, Co 85246 notably
recorded higher pol values compared to all other varieties under test with lower values of
reducing sugars.
(a) Germination percentage: |
Co 85246 recorded significantly higher germination (72.51) compared to CoC
92061 |
and Co 87044 and it was on par with CoC 671, Co 86032, CoM 88121 and Co
8014. |
(b) Cane formed shoots (lakh/ha): |
Co 86032 recorded significantly higher (1.75) cane formed shoots over CoC
671 (1.53) |
and Co 8014 (1.52). Age of harvest did not influence on cane formed
shoots. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoC 92061 recorded significantly higher (26.02) no. of internodes over
other all varieties. 16th month of harvest recorded significantly higher no. of internodes
(27.13) over 10th (18.53), 12th (23.61) and 14th (25.07) month of harvest. Interaction
effect of on internode number was found significant indicating maximum internodes on CoC
92061 with 16th month and minimum in Co 8014 with 10th month. |
|
The varieties did not deffer with respect to plant height.
However significantly higher plant height (245.74) at 16th month of harvest was observed
which was on par with 12th (234.02) 14th (239.64) month of harvest. |
|
There was no significant difference for NMC due to various varieties.
However numerically higher NMC were observed in CoM 88121. The NMC were not varied
significantly due to various ages of harvest. |
|
Co 86032 recorded significantly higher cane yield (94.94) and it was on
par with CoC 671 (93.46), CoC 92061 (92.84) and CoM 88121 (91.17) Co 85246 (81.54) and Co
8014 (81.97) recorded significantly lower cane yield 16th month of harvest recorded
significantly higher cane yield (104.90) compared to 14th (94.91), 12th (84.71) and 10th
(73.07) month of harvest. |
|
Co 86032 (13.28), CoC 671 (13.23), CoC 92061 (13.01) and CoM 88121 (12.49)
showed on par results of CCS yield 16th month of harvest recorded significantly higher CCS
yield (15.94) compared to 10th (7.08) 12th (11.90) and 14th (14.41) month of harvest. |
(h) Juice quality parameters (Table 3a) |
Co 85246 produced significantly higher brix value (21.06) compared to
other varieties and it was on par with CoC 671 (20.54) 16th and 14th month of harvest
recorded on par brix value and differed significantly from 10th and 12th month of harvest.
In case of pol value CoC 671 (18.54), Co 85246 (18.45), CoC 92061 (18.28) and Co 86032
(18.29) recorded on par values 16th and 14th month of harvest recorded on par results and
deffered significantly from 10th and 12th month of harvest. Reducing sugars were
significantly lower in CoC 671, CoC 92061, Co 86032 and Co 87044 compared to CoM 88121 and
Co 8014. Significantly lower reducing sugars was recorded at 16th and 14th month of
harvest compared to 10th and 12th month. |
|
In this trial Co 86032, CoC 92061 and CoC 671 performed better compared to
other varieties in producing higher CCS and cane yield. |
Experiment No. 4: (Table 4)
(a) Germination percentage: |
CoC
92061 recorded significantly higher germination percentage (79.33) over rest of the
varieties and other treatments did not influence on germination percentage. |
(b) Cane formed shoots (Lakh/ha): |
Co
85246 recorded significantly higher cane formed shoots (2.04) over CoC 671, Co 87044 and
Co 8014. Other varieties shown on par with results with that of Co 85246 interms of cane
formed shoots. Age of harvest ie 10th, 12th, 14th and 16th month did not differ
significantly with respect to cane formed shoots. |
|
Co
87044 recorded significantly higher plant height (271.21) compared to Co 85246, Co
86032, CoM 88121 and Co 8014. It was on par with Co 92061, (267.58) CoC 671 (263.60) 16th
and 14th month of harvest produced on par plant height. |
|
Significantly
higher no. of internodes were recorded with CoC 92061 (29.83), Co 85246 (29.40), Co 86032
over Co 8014, CoM 88121 and CoC 671. 16th (28.72) and 14th (27.71) month of harvest
recorded significantly higher no. of internodes. |
|
NMC
were did not differ significantly due to varieties and age of harvest and also their
interaction. |
|
Varieties
CoC 671 (89.69), CoM 88121 (87.20) CoC 92061 (80.36), Co 86032 (80.11) and Co 87044
(84.96) were found on par with each other and were significantly higher over Co 85246
(76.79) and Co 8014 (80.96) which were found on par with each other significantly higher
cane yield recorded at 16th month of harvest compared to 10th, 12th and 14th month of
harvest. |
|
CoC
92061 (12.56), CoC 671 (12.63), Co 86032 (11.81), CoM 88121 (11.61), Co 87044 (11.56) were
shown on par results with respect to CCS yield and found significantly superior over Co
85246 (10.14) and Co 8014 (11.27) 12th, 14th and 16th month of harvest recorded on par
results with respect CCS yield however they differed significantly superior over 10th
month of harvest. |
(h) Juice quality parameters: (Table 4a) |
Significantly
higher brix value was recorded in Co 85246 (21.60) compared to all other varieties.
Significantly higher brix value was observed at 12th and 14th month of harvest compared to
10th and 16th months of harvest. The maximum brix of 23.81 was recorded in Co 85246 with
12th month of harvest and minimum in CoM 88121 with 10th month. Significantly higher pol
value was recorded in CoC 92061 (19.21) and was on par with CoC 671, Co 85246, Co 8014.
Significantly higher pol value was recorded with 12th and 14th month of harvest compared
to 10th and 16th month of harvest. Co 85246 with 12th month recorded maximum pol (22.63)
and minimum in Co 8014 with 10th month (15.11). Significantly lower reducing sugars was
observed in Co 85246 compared to CoM 88121 and Co 8014. Similarly significantly lower
reducing sugars was recorded at 16th and 14th month of harvest. Interaction effect was
non-significant. |
|
In this
trial apart from CoC 671 and CoC 92061 the varieties like CoM 88121 and Co 86032 have
performed better with respect to cane and CCS yield. |
Experiment No.
5 (Table 5)
(a) Germination percentage: |
These
was no significant difference observed in different varietal germination percentage and
their interaction effect. |
(b) Cane formed shoots (lakh/ha) |
Significantly
higher cane formed shoots were recorded in Co 85246 (2.14) compared to Co 86032 (1.87),
CoC 671 (1.59), CoC 92061 (1.40) and Co 8014 (1.69) and on par with each other. Cane
formed shoots did not differ due to various months of harvest. |
|
Co
87044 recorded significantly higher plant ht. (328.76) compared to all other varieties.
Significantly higher plant height (317.40) was recorded at 16th month compared to 14th
(299.95), 12th (280.45) and 10th (200.91) month of harvest. |
|
Significantly
higher no. of internodes (29.23) were observed in CoC 92061 compared to all other
varieties. 16th month (29.65) harvest recorded significantly higher no. of internodes
compared to 10th, 12th and 14th month of harvest. |
|
N.M.C
were did not differ significantly due to various varieties, months of harvest and also due
to their interaction. |
|
CoC 671
(100.60) and CoC 92061 (96.89) recorded significantly higher cane yield over other
varieties. Co 86032 (92.60) and CoM 88121 (92.46) recorded significantly higher cane yield
over Co 85246 (81.45). Significantly higher cane yield was recorded (103.94) at 16th month
of harvest compared to 10th (76.53), 12th (88.19) and 14th (98.06) month of harvest. |
|
Significantly
higher CCS yield was recorded in CoC 671 (13.81) and CoC 92061 (13.87) compared to all
other varieties and both of these varieties were on par with each other. CCS yield was on
par for rest of the varieties under test. 16th month of harvest recorded significantly
higher CCS yield (14.18) compared to 10th (10.28), 12th (12.98) and 14th (13.81) month of
harvest. There interaction effect was not found significant. |
(h) Juice quality parameters: (Table 5a) |
Brix
values were found on par with each other in Co 85246 (21.50), CoC 92061 (20.36), CoC 671
(20.20), Co 87044 (20.13) and Co 86032 (19.98). 12th month of harvest produced
significantly higher brix (21.38) compared to 10th (19.98) 14th (20.45) and 16th (19.55)
month of harvest. Significantly higher (19.80) pol value observed in Co 85246 compared to
all other varieties. Singificantly higher pol percentage (19.64) was recorded at 12th
month of harvest compared to 10th (17.95), 14th (18.80) and 16th (18.21) month of harvest.
Varieties did not differ significantly with respect to reducing sugars. 16th and 14th
month harvest recorded significantly lower reducing sugars compared to 10th and 12th month
of harvest. Interaction effect was non- significant. |
|
CoC
92061 and CoC 671 varieties were found on par with each other and Co 86032 is also known
to produce higher CCS yield compared to other midlate varieties. Increased age of harvest
increased the CCS yield. |
Experiment No.
6 (Table 6)
(a) Germination percentage: |
Germination percentage did not influence either due to different
treatments and their interaction. |
(b) Cane formed shoots (lakh/ha): |
CoM
88121 recorded significantly higher (2.22) cane formed shoots compared to CoC 671, Co
85246, Co 8014 and Co 86032 and showed on par results with CoC 92061 (1.94), Co 87044
(1.96) month of harvest did not influence cane formed shoots and also the interaction of
varieties and month of harvest did not shown any significant results. |
|
Co
86032 recorded significantly higher plant height (243.61) compared to CoC 671, Co 85246,
CoM 88121, Co 8014, CoC 92061 but found on par with Co 87044 (240.79), CoC 92061 (232.07).
Plant height was significantly higher (272.26) at 16th month compared to 10th
(183.46) 12th (210.15) and 14th (232.86) month. Interaction was found non-significant. |
|
CoC
92061 recorded significantly higher no. of internodes (24.82) compared to all other
varieties. Significantly higher no. of internodes were recorded at 16th month (24.56)
compared to 14th (22.03), 12th (20.04) and 10th month of harvest (17.33). |
|
N.M.C
were not differed significantly due to varieties and also due to age of harvest and their
interaction. |
|
Co
86032 produced significantly higher cane yield (104.14) compared to all other varieties.
However CoC 92061 (94.02) CoC 671 (95.69). Co 85246 (92.68), Co 87044 (93.25), CoM 88121
(94.08) were found on par with each other and recorded significantly higher yield than Co
8014 (88.21). 16th month of harvest recorded significantly higher cane yield (104.26)
compared to 14th (101.46) 12th (92.75) and 10th (79.83) month of harvest. The interaction
was non-significant. |
|
Significantly
higher CCS yield was recorded in Co 86032 (14.91) compared to Co 87044, CoM 88121 and Co
8014 however it was on par with CoC 671 (13.83), CoC 92061 (13.80), Co 85246 (14.28). 12th
(14.22) and 14th (15.04) month harvest was on par with each other and significantly higher
over 10th (11.43) and 16th month (13.65). Interaction effect was non-significant. |
(h) Juice quality parameters: (Table 6a) |
Co
85246 (22.19) recorded significantly higher brix value compared to all other varieties
except CoC 671 (21.39). Other varieties were on par with each other except Co 87044. 12th
month (22.38) harvest recorded significantly higher brix value compared to 10th (20.93),
14th (21.59) and 16th month (19.38) of harvest. Co 85246 at 12th month recorded maximum
brix value (23.33) and minimum brix value recorded at 16th month in Co 87044 (16.63). Co
85246 recorded significantly higher pol value (20.57) compared to all other varieties.
12th month harvest recorded significantly higher pol value (20.45) compared to 10th
(19.09), 14th (19.77) and 16th (17.40) month of harvest. Significantly lower reducing
sugars recorded in Co 85246 (0.65), CoC 671 (0.75) and Co 86032 (0.76). Significantly
lower reducing sugars (0.65) was recorded at 12th month compared to 10th (0.87), 12th
(0.80) and 14th month (0.92) of harvest. All juice quality parameters were shown
non-significant results. |
|
Co 86032, CoC 671, CoC 92061 were found better with respect cane and sugar
yield. |
TABLE 1. EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON
(SEPTEMBER-96) (1997-98)
| |
|
Cane formed shoots (Lak/Ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(CONTD.) EVALUATION
OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID AND LATE CRUSHING SEASON (SEPTEMBER-96) (1997-98)
TABLE 1a.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON (SEPTEMBER '96)
(1997-98)
TABLE 2.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON (OCTOBER-96)
(1997-98)
| |
|
Cane formed shoots (Lak/Ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(CONTD.) EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID AND LATE CRUSHING SEASON
(OCTOBER-96)(1997-98)
TABLE 2a.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON (OCTOBER '96)
(1997-98)
TABLE 3.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON (NOVEMBER-96)
(1997-98)
| |
|
Cane formed shoots (Lak/Ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(CONTD.)
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID AND LATE CRUSHING SEASON (NOVEMBER-96)
(1997-98)
TABLE 3a. EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON
(NOVEMBER '96) (1997-98)
TABLE 4.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON (DECEMBER-96)
(1997-98)
| |
|
Cane formed shoots (Lak/Ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(CONTD.)
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID AND LATE CRUSHING SEASON (DECEMBER-96)
(1997-98)
TABLE 4a.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSHING SEASON (DECEMBER '96)
(1997-98)
TABLE 5. EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSHING SEASON
(JANUARY-97) (1997-98)
| |
|
Cane formed shoots (Lak/Ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(CONTD.)
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID AND LATE CRUSHING SEASON (JANUARY-97)
(1997-98)
TABLE 5a.
EVALUATION OF PROMISING VARIETIES FOR EARLY, MID & LATE CRUSING SEASON (JANUARY - 97)
(1997-98)
|