go         go      www.somaiya.edu
Somaiya GroupYour life lineKarnataka Institute of Applied Agricultural Research
ResearchKarnataka Institute of Applied Agricultural Research
Research indexKarnataka Institute of Applied Agricultural Research
clear.gif (44 bytes)

Crop : Sugarcane, Soybean

Field : Argronomy

Title : Studies on response of CoC 92061 to various agronomic practices

Author : R. B. Khandgave and P.G. Satpute.

Year : 1996- 97

This experiment was laid out on 31st August 1995. In this trial, three levels of seed rate viz. 56,250 (So) (25% less than the recommended) 75,000 (S1)   (recommended) and 1,12,500 (S2) (50% more than the recommended), eye buds per ha and three levels of Nitrogen viz. 187.5 (No) (25% less than the recommended) 250 (N1) (recommended) and 375 (N2) Kg N/ha (50% more than recommended) were  imposed for normal furrow planting as well as paired row planting method. In between laid out in randomised block design with three replications.

a) Yield and yield attributres

The observations on germination percentage, cane formed shoots (lakh/ha),   plant height (cm), number of internodes, number of millable canes ('ooo/ha), cane yield (MT/ha) C.C.S. Yield (MT/ha) etc. are given in Table 1. Quality parameters are given in Table 2.

None of the juice quality parameters were influenced either by methods of planting or seed rate or nitrogen levels. Similarly fibre and moisture% also did not significantly differ due to any of the treatments. All the interaction effects of all parameters were found non-significant. Soybean which was sown in between paired rows of sugarcane failed due to severe incidence of rust. It was sown in month of August-95 (late sowing).

RESULTS

Based on the observations it is concluded that paired row planting produced same cane and CCS yield compared to conventional furrow method of planting without leaving any deterimental effect on any of the parameters studied. Therefore by adopting this method, weed control, becomes cost and additional yield of intercrop could also be  obtained. The optimum seed rate for CoC 92061 is found to be @ 75,000 eye buds/ha for obtaining higher cane and CCS yields and similarly varied levels of nitrogen   increased sugarcane yield without having significant ill effect on juice quality parameters. The suitable dose of nitrogen for CoC 92061 is found to be 250 Kg N/ha, (although 375 Kg/ha produced significantly higher CCS yield) because application of N @ 250 and 375 Kg/ha produced non significant results with respect to cane yields.

(Table 1 and Table 2).

Table 1. EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS, SEED RATES AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON SUGARCANE YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES (Cv. CoC 92061) (1996-97)

Treatment

Germination

Cane formed shoots

Plant hieght

No. of internodes

N.M.C

Cane yield

C.C.S. yield

    

(%)

(Lakh/ha)

(Cm)

       

( ' 000/ha)

(Mt/ha)

(Mt/ha)

Seed rate

                                                                     

S0

84.06

   

1.34

   

221.03

   

27.69

   

95.69

   

97.4

   

15.28

   

S1

83.66

    

1.53

    

218.95

    

25.62

    

103.2

    

101.13

    

15.77

    

S2

79.76

   

1.73

   

218.79

   

26.54

   

101.73

   

99.72

   

15.24

   

N-Levels

                                                                       

NO

82.18

    

1.49

    

214.35

    

26.41

    

102.88

    

90.41

    

14.02

    

N1

83.61

   

1.59

   

222.34

   

26.87

   

103.71

   

102.05

   

15.94

   

N2

81.69

   

1.58

   

225.05

   

26.58

   

104.77

   

106.18

   

16.21

   
          

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

S

0.83

NS

0.06

NS

5.998

0.17

0.51

NS

1.59

4.68

1.67

4.91

0.07

0.21

N

0.83

NS

0.06

NS

5.998

NS

0.51

NS

1.59

NS

1.67

4.91

0.07

0.21

NXS

1.43

NS

0.1

NS

10.376

NS

0.89

NS

1.78

NS

2.89

NS

0.13

NS


Table 2. EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS, SEED RATES AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON SUGARCANE QUALITY PARAMETERS (Cv. CoC 92061) (1996-97)

Treatment

Brix

Pol

Reducing sugars

Fibre

Moisture

     

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

Seed rate

                                                      

S0

22.11

   

20.92

   

0.555

   

14.11

   

69.81

   

S1

22.17

    

20.79

    

0.549

    

14.24

    

69.56

    

S2

21.98

   

20.34

   

0.59

   

14.45

   

69.92

   

N-Levels

                                                     

NO

22.1

    

20.67

    

0.58

    

14.27

    

69.69

    

N1

22.19

   

20.82

   

0.52

   

14.41

   

69.75

   

N2

21.96

   

20.36

   

0.58

   

14.33

   

69.83

   
      

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

SEm+

CD (5%)

S

0.17

NS

0.14

NS

0.04

NS

0.22

NS

0.06

NS

N

0.17

NS

0.14

NS

0.04

NS

0.22

NS

0.06

NS

NXS

0.29

NS

0.24

NS

0.067

NS

0.38

NS

0.11

NS

 

<back
^top