go         go      www.somaiya.edu
Somaiya GroupYour life lineKarnataka Institute of Applied Agricultural Research
ResearchKarnataka Institute of Applied Agricultural Research
Research IndexKarnataka Institute of Applied Agricultural Research
clear.gif (44 bytes)

Crop : Sugarcane.

Field : Plant Breeding

Collaborator : Self.

Title : Mid-late Varietal Trial - 1991-92.

Author : T.D. Krishna Murthy and S.I.Harlapur.

Year : 1991-92

Here also we have tested 11 different varieties with Co 740 as standared. Variety Co 8021 has recorded highest yield of 132.9 T/ha while Co 8011 and Co 8014 were almost equal 124.5 and 124.7 (Tonnes/ha). But maximum No. of millable canes has been obtained by Co 7910 (115400) while Co 8021 has recorded NMC of 105200 and Co 8011 (98900) and Co 8014 (89800) respectively. As far as juice quality is concerned Co 8021 has pol percent juice (19.45). The highest being recorded by Co 85246 (22.45%). Co 8011 and Co 8014 were almost equal (20.38% and 20.88%). This project also has two years of data. We are making a pooled analysis of these two years data and are eliminating those varieties whose performance is consistently poor (Vide Table No. 2).

Table No. 2. Mid-late Varieties Trial 1991.

Yield and Quality Attributes of Different Varieties.

Varieties

NMC/ha

Yield

Pol %

Pol *

Mean

    

('ooo)

T/ha

Juice

T/ha

R.S %

Co 740

100.0

99.1

20.13

14.36

0.350

Co 7219

97.6

100.9

20.71

15.04

0.261

Co 7805

79.2

103.9

20.58

15.39

0.197

Co 7910

115.4

107.9

18.53

14.39

0.527

Co 7914

78.1

97.2

19.46

13.61

0.315

Co 8011

98.9

124.5

20.38

18.26

0.405

Co 8014

89.8

124.7

20.88

18.74

0.264

Co 8021

105.2

132.9

19.45

18.61

0.459

Co 85019

85.6

103.9

19.76

14.78

0.684

Co 85021

95.5

99.5

20.51

14.69

0.635

Co 85061

95.6

106.5

21.03

16.12

0.340

Co 85246

73.7

95.0

22.45

15.35

0.263

      

* Calculated by taking J-R = 0.72.

Varieties Co 7805 was poor yielder during 1990-91 (95.2 T/ha) and during 1991-92 Co 85246 was a poor yielder (95.0 T/ha). During 1990-91 lowest pol was 19.18% recorded by Co 7910 and during 1991-92 lowest pol was 18.53% recorded by Co 7910.

 

Crop

  

: Sugarcane,Soybean.

         
                    

Field

  

: Agronomy

         
                        

Collaborator

  

: Self.

           
                     

Title

 

: Soybean intercrop in Sugarcane 1991-92.

   
                       

Author

  

: T.D. Krishna Murthy and S.I.Harlapur .

     
                   

Year

  

: 1991-92

                 
                         
                              

The first year of the trial is completed. It has been observed that increased level

of fertilizer application (from 75% to 100%) has improved cane yield 234.67 Kg/plot to

258.83 Kg/plot. At 125% of normal dose of fertilizer a further improvement in yield was

noticed (280.30 Kg/plot). Yield of sugarcane, intercropped with soybean was higher than

a pure stand crop. (292.06 Kg/plot and 258.0 Kg/plot respectively).

   
               

The effect on NMC by intercropping was however negative i.e. NMC in intercropped

plots was lesser than pure stand crop 271 in pure stand of sugarcane and 266.170 in

    

intercrop plots in normal dose of fertilizer (Vide Table No. 3).

      
                                

Table No. 3. Sugarcane Yield Kg per Plot Variety CoC 671.

             
                            
   

CROPPING SYSTEMS (CS)

 
    

CS1

CS2

 
    

Sugarcane Pure Stand

Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping

 
    

FERTILIZER LEVELS (fL)

FERTILIZER LEVELS (fL)

 
   

f L1

f L2

f L3

f L1

f L2

f L3

 

BLOCKS

3/4 Normal

1 Normal

11/4 Normal

3/4 Normal

1 Normal

11/4 Normal

 
                                  

1

232

243

278

240

299

348

   

2

235

268

294

277

284

294

  

3

238

244

273

282

289

317

   

4

255

286

297

279

319

340

   

5

234

263

275

243

285

301

    

6

214

249

266

238

295

327

   
                                         

MEAN

234.67

258.83

280.50

259.83

295.17

321.17

    
                                     

Table A 2.2: Number of Millable Canes (NMC) per plot VAR. CoC 671.

      
                                       
       

CROPPING SYSTEMS (CS)

    
    

CS1

CS2

   
   

Sugarcane Pure Stand

Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping

   
  

FERTILIZER LEVELS (fL)

FERTILIZER LEVELS (fL)

     
  

f L1

f L2

f L3

f L1

f L2

f L3

   

BLOCKS

3/4 Normal

1 Normal

11/4 Normal

3/4 Normal

1 Normal

11/4 Normal

   
                                    

1

296

276

265

254

268

290

    

2

304

265

271

258

270

267

   

3

281

255

267

260

261

270

     

4

298

280

311

260

304

285

    

5

281

270

320

260

254

264

     

6

271

280

294

239

240

260

    
                                        

MEAN

288.50

271.00

288.00

255.17

266.17

272.67

   
                                               

Table A 2.3: Seed Yield in Soybean (Intercrop), Kg per plot Variety. Monetta:

 
                                     

Fertilizer

B L O C K S

Mean

Levels

1

2

3

4

5

6

     
                                                  

3/4 Normal

0.766

0.838

0.911

1.247

0.838

0.634

0.8723

                                            

1 Normal

0.911

1.393

1.127

0.924

1.038

0.911

1.0493

               

11/4 "

0.845

1.241

0.851

0.851

1.102

0.983

0.9788

               

Crop

 

: Sugarcane.

       
               

Field

 

: Agronomy

       
                                

Collaborator

   

: Self.

                   
                                  

Title

   

: Effect of Zn So4 on Sugarcane Yield and Quality 1991-92.

    
                                 

Author

    

: T.D. Krishna Murthy and S.I.Harlapur .

   
                                     

Year

     

: 1991-92

                              
                                              

Zn So4 at 4 different levels have been tried i.el at 12.5, 25.0, 37.5 and 50.0 Kg/ha with

one check was tested on three different varieties Co 8011, Co 8014 and CoC 671. The

general trend noticed here was that with increased dosage of Zn So4 from '0' to 25 Kg/ha.

there was increase in yield (from 161 Kg to 193.6 Kg/plot). But at 37.5 Kg/ha in variety

Co 8011 has not showed any improved yield. However at 50 Kg/ha. dose again there was an

increase in yield. (222.6 Kg/plot). A similar is the case with CoC 671. (from 140.3 Kg/plot

to 179 Kg/plot) with the dosage from ' O ' to 25 Kg/ha). In respect of No. of millable canes

there is rise in No. of canes with the rise in Zinc Sulphate levels in case of variety Co 8011.

But Co 8014k and CoC 671 have behaved abnormally (Vide Table No. 4A and 4B).

    
                                       

Table No. 4A. Sugarcane Yield Kg/plot. (Plot size : 8 rows of 6 m length)

Varieties

Replication

Zn So4 (levels Kg/ha)

         

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Mean

    

RI

160

172

184

180

232

185.6

Co 8011

RII

166

186

184

193

190

183.8

    

RIII

157

185

213

208

246

201.8

    

Mean

161

181

193.6

193.6

222.6

190.4

   

RI

150

146

201

202

227

185.2

Co 8014

RII

134

129

151

168

233

163.0

    

RIII

130

157

219

218

235

191.8

    

Mean

138

144

190.3

196

231.6

180.0

    

RI

146

165

177

170

187

169.0

CoC 671

RII

148

166

172

174

215

175.0

    

RIII

127

180

188

208

196

179.8

    

Mean

140.3

170.3

179

184

199.3

174.6

Table No. 4B. No. of Millable Canes/Plot. (Plot size : 8 rows of 6 m size)

Varieties

Replication

Zn So4 (levels Kg/ha)

        

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Mean

    

RI

169

160

161

173

165

165.6

Co 8011

RII

131

168

175

158

185

163.4

    

RIII

190

182

186

198

191

189.4

    

Mean

163.3

170

174

176.3

180.3

171.8

    

RI

170

161

223

203

179

187.2

Co 8014

RII

180

167

163

188

174

174.4

    

RIII

204

214

191

187

200

199.2

    

Mean

184.6

180.6

192.3

196.8

184.3

186.9

    

RI

163

156

162

144

156

156.2

CoC 671

RII

159

155

135

158

143

150.0

    

RIII

151

162

168

180

161

164.4

 

Mean

157.6

157.6

155.0

160.6

153.3

156.8

 

<back
^top