Under this
programme spacing trial was conducted with Co 997 with 5 inter row spacing (30, 45, 60, 75
and 90 cms) in randomised block design. The height at 8 months flowering and juice quality
at 12 months age were collected and presented in Table 8:1. The yield and millable cane
data observed at final harvest are appended in Table 8:2, 8:3. Although the yield
differences were not statistically significant among the spacings, millalble cane number
per hactare was significantly higher in 45, 60 cm spacings as compared to 30 cm spacing.
The millable cane number were significantly lower in 75 and 90 cm spacing as compared 45,
60 cm spacing due to decrease in number of plants per hactare. The results suggested high
tillering genotypes like Co 997 require inter plant spacings if 45 and 60 cms.
|
5. Design : Randomised block design |
|
6. Date of Planting : 21st July 1980 |
3. Plot Size : 145.8 Sqm. |
7. Date of Harvesting : 24-12-1981. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE - 8:2. Data
Showing Yield Qtls/ha. |
|
5. Design : Randomised block design |
|
6. Date of Planting : 21st July 1980 |
3. Plot Size : 145.8 Sqm. |
7. Date of Harvesting : 24-12-1981. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:2-2. Analysis of variance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'F' Test indicates non significants. |
|
|
|
8:2-3. Summary of Results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE - 8:3. Data
Showing Millable Canes ha-1. |
|
|
5. Design : Randomised block design |
|
|
6. Date of Planting : 21st July 1980 |
|
3. Plot Size : 145.8 Sqm. |
7. Date of Harvesting : 24-12-1981. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:3-1. Millable Canes ha-1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:3-2. Analysis of variance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'F' Significant at 1% level. |
|
|
|
8:3-3. Summary of Results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C.D. for treatments = 0.1542. |
|
|
|