 |
Collaborator :
M/s. Indian Potash Ltd.
Title : To study
the response of sugarcane to Potassium fertilisation on Sameerwadi soils.
Author : R
.S.Sachan, A.T. Yaragattikar,P,Y,Keskar , R.G.Menon and H.L.Kulkarny.
In an earlier
experiment it was found that the application of potassic fertilizer does not produce any
response in the sugarcane crop on our farm soils despite the fact that an analysis of the
soil shows a deficiency of available potash. To confirm this finding an experiment was
laid out as per details in Table IX.
Table IX.
Experiment : Study of Response to Potassium Fertilization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Variety : Co 740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.
Replication : Four |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.
Plot size : 115.2 Sq. M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.
Date of Planting : 2nd December, 1975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6.
Date of Harvest: 6th January, 1977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
differences between treatments were not statistically significant either in respect of
cane yield or in respect of CCS/ha. The soil of field No. D-8/72 was analysed before the
experiment was laid out. The results of the analysis are given in Table X.
Table
X. Experiment : Study of Response To Potassium Fertilisation - Soil Analysis Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson 1958. Wet digestion with hydrofluoric acid and perchloric acid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maclean, 1 : 1 soil water ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From this data it is seen that the soil is : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) High in non-exchangeable K |
|
|
|
|
|
iii) High in water soluble K and |
|
|
|
|
|
iv) Low to medium in K fixation capacity. |
|
|
|
|
Therefore, apparently the soil is able to supply adequate potash to the
crop even without potassium fertilisation. This condition may prevail for 5 to 6 more crop
cycles. Thereafter, it is to be expected that increasing response to potash fertilisation
will be obtainable. |
III. Potash trial to test the contention that best results from
application of Potash are obtained with split application (in collaboration with M/s.
Indian Potash Ltd.)
An experiment was
conducted as per details in Table XI to test the claim that split application of Potash
gives better crop response. |
Table XI. Experiment : Study on Response to Split Application to Potash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.
Replication : Four |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.
Plot size : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.
Date of Planting : 6th January, 1976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6.
Date of Harvest: 17th December, 1976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences
between treatment were not statistically significant either in respect of cane yield or in
respect of sugar yield.
|
|