Crop : Sugarcane,Onion Groundnut,Moong andSugarbeet.
Title : Companion
Cropping Trials.
Author : R
.S.Sachan, A.T. Yaragattikar,P,Y,Keskar , R.G.Menon and H.L.Kulkarny.
a) An experiment
to investigate the feasibily of raising a sugar beet crop with autumn planted sugarcane,
without significantly affecting cane yield was laid out in field No. E-3/72. The details
of the experiment are as given in Table IV.
Table IV.
Experiment - Companion Cropping : Sugarcane + Beet.
Plot size - 150
sq. metres
Date of Planting
- Cane nursery - 18th Sept. 76
Cane
transplanting - 15th Oct. 76
Cane - cane to be
harvested in November 1977.
Beet sowing -
20th Oct. 76
Treatments : A) Sugarcane alone in rows spaced 90 cm. |
|
|
| |
B) Sugarcane in rows spaced 45 cm. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
C) Sugarcane in paired rows with 2 rows |
|
| |
of beet in the 135 cm. interspace. |
|
| |
D) Sugar beet alone in rows spaced |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By the beginning of
December the beet crop started over shadowing the cane in treatment C. Consequently the
tillering in cane was poorer than in the other treatments. It may perhaps be possible to
over come this difficulty by transplanting the cane by the middle of September so as to
give it a lead of a month over the beet. In that case, however, there is a possibility
that by the middle of March the cane will start shading the beet. The shading effect of
cane on beet may not affect beet yield as much as the shading of cane by beet may affect
cane yield. The harvesting of beet may perhaps present some problem, as the cane crop will
not permit use of any animal or tractor drawn implement for harvesting beet.
The beet crop did
well in general, despite some damage from cut worms, cercospora and root rot suspected to
be due to born deficiency.
b) With a view to
working out profitable companion cropping patterns suited to North Karnataka, an
experiment was laid out in field No. 18/72 as per details given in Table V.
Table V.
Experiment Companion Cropping Patterns.
Plot size : 13.5
M x 14 M.
Moong : 1st
Picking - 14th Dec. 1975
Date of Harvest :
Cane - 15th Oct. 1976
Date of planting
: Cane nursery : 1st Sept. 1975
Cane transplant :
8th Oct. 1975
Groundnut : 2nd
Feb, 1976
Groundnut sown :
10th Oct. 1975
Onion : 10th
January 1976.
Moong sown : 10th
Oct. 1975
Onion nursery :
1st Sept. 1975
Onion
Transplanted : 10th Oct. 1975.
Treatments : A)
Autumn planted cane along
B) Autumn planted
cane + Moong
C) Autumn planted
cane + Groundnut
D) Autumn planted
cane + Onion
Fertilizer : Cane
- N - 200 Kg/ha in 4 equal split
Moong ) N - 20
Kg/ha basal
Groundnut ) P -
20 Kg/ha basal
Onion ) K - 20
Kg/ha basal
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1. Yield of canes/ha in tonnes |
|
|
|
|
2. Yield of Intercrop/ha in tonnes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Commercial cane sugar % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
7. Total Gross Income Rs. |
|
|
|
|
In the sugarcane
+ moong plots two rows of moong were sown 15 cm. apart on the flattened tops of ridges and
in the sugarcane + onion plots two rows of onion seedlings were transplanted 15 cm apart.
In the case of Groundnut, however, the number of rows was reduced to one, to compensate
for the longer period this crop would occupy the field. Such a compensation was not
considered necessary in the case of Onions because the shading effect in this case would
be negligible. Fertilizer for the companion crop was applied at the top of the redge
between the two rows of the crop and fertilizer for the cane was applied at the bottom of
the furrow. From the data in table V it is seen that, there has been a marginal, though
statistically non-significant increase in the yield of cane in treatment B and a marginal
decrease in yield in treatment C. This tends to prove that the decision to limit the
number of rows of groundnut between adjacent rows of cane to one, was well taken.
Treatment D had no effect on the cane yield. None of the treatments affected the juice
quality in cane adversely. All three crop combinations have resulted in increased returns
from land per unit area per unit time, the return from treatment C being amount Rs.
1,000/- less than in the other two cases. The relative profitability of different crop
combination is however subject to considerable variation from year to year depending on
the price level of different agricultural commodities. Moong perhaps has an edge over
onion as a companion because of the relative ease with which it can be handled and stored.